West CoastReefers
🏠Home
💬Community Forums
👋Introductions🌺Coral🐠Fish🏵️Anemones & Clownfish⚙️Equipment🧪Water Chemistry🦀General🔧DIY📷Photography🌱Beginner Help🏪Local Fish Stores🤝Sponsors⭐Vendor Reviews🛋️Lounge💡Site Feedback
📅Events🏆Contests🐡Builds🐠Marketplace🔨Auctions🏗️Stand BuilderNEW🧮Calculators👥Members
→Sign in
AboutTerms & rulesPrivacyContact
🏠Home💬Forums🐠Market🔨Auctions→Sign in
+ New threadSign in
About·Nonprofit·Donate·Giveaway winners·Terms & rules·Privacy policy·Contact·info@westcoastreefers.com
© 2026 West Coast Reefers
@mescobar
SCRM😎 Cool Kids🌸Polyp Whisperer
Joined Aug 202629 posts155 pts★5.0(1)
🔧 Build Contributor
General·Oct 3·👁 62#1

AquaBiomics Results

When I heard AquaBiomics was shutting its doors (and with no other alternatives in the market), it was now or never for ordering a Microbiome test. Thankfully, I was able to catch one of the last 4 batches. I collected my sample by the end of July and didn’t receive my results until today. It took quite some time from when the sample was batched/sequenced, to when the reports were generated. He must have wanted to do them all at once for the last and final time. I thought I would share some of my results, so we can shame the biome and pathogens in my tank together. Buyer beware if you get corals from my tank!!1! What you don’t know can’t hurt you (maybe). It looks like my microbiome is average in diversity, but well balanced in the distribution of bacteria. Diversity
  • list item“A score of 355 places your tank in the 51st percentile — right in line with the typical reef tank in our reference dataset.”
Balance
  • list item“A score of 0.68 places your tank in the 94th percentile — the community closely matches the typical mature reef tank.“
The community of biomes looks like there are a few microbial families that differ from most other tanks in the data set. The differences indicate I have high DOCs which will negatively impact my biome overall. Excess families (higher than typical)
  • Mycobacteriaceae - often associated with Fish TB
  • Lachnospiraceae - strongly indicates excess organic waste
  • Bacteroidaceae
Deficient families (lower than typical)
  • Pelagibacteraceae - free-living bacteria that thrive in clean, low-nutrient waters
  • Flavobacteriaceae
  • Alteromonadaceae - reduces your tanks natural biological resilience
Nitrifying Community, looks like I have plenty of Ammonia-Oxidizing Microbes, but am lacking in Nitrite-Oxidizing Bacteria. Nitrifying microbes are detected in 97% of tanks (AOM) and 49% of tanks (NOB) in our reference dataset. Looks like I should try increasing my NOBs.

— Stay Salty

4

Replies (4)

Jump to newest ↓
  1. @mescobar
    SCRM😎 Cool Kids🌸Polyp WhispererOP
    Joined Aug 202629 posts155 pts★5.0(1)
    🔧 Build Contributor
    Oct 3#2
Reply
Share your experience…
Sign in to join the conversationSign in →
And as far as pathogens are concerned, there looks to be a fair amount present. Vibrio fortis (67th percentile)
  • Fairly average, assuming most of us have this pathogen present.
Vibrio owensii (88th percentile)
  • It appears in about 25% of healthy and established reef aquariums (oops), but it can act as an opportunistic pathogen linked to coral tissue-loss diseases like Montipora white syndrome. My monits are looking just fine… for now.
SCTLD-associated Shimia sp. (96th percentile)
  • “Because Rhodobacteraceae thrive on organic waste, high Shimia levels often signal that detritus, sediment, or decaying matter is accumulating in stagnant zones of the tank.”
  • “The exact cause of SCTLD in the wild remains complex and may involve a virus that attacks a coral's Symbiodiniaceae algal symbionts. Shimia sp. behaves as an opportunistic, secondary invader. It rapidly multiplies in response to decaying coral tissue, detritus, and elevated nutrients”
  • Sounds like this can be attributed to a lack of mechanical filtration, possible build up of detritus, and/or dirty sandbed.
Vibrio shiloi (91st percentile)
  • “Temperature-dependent, Gram-negative marine bacterium that causes coral bleaching by attacking zooxanthellae photosynthesis”
  • Seems like I could be at risk of coral bleaching if the tank gets too hot, I don’t think I want to find out if this is true.

— Stay Salty

  • @mescobar
    SCRM😎 Cool Kids🌸Polyp WhispererOP
    Joined Aug 202629 posts155 pts★5.0(1)
    🔧 Build Contributor
    Oct 3#3
    Actions & Takeaways:
    1. Consider adding bottled bacteria to increase Nitrification NOBs
    2. Monitor sensitive corals like Monits and Bernardpora.
    3. Turn my UV Sterilizer back on to help manage vibrio pathogens.
    4. Stir up sandbed and sump, do a good water change to remove excess detritus.
    5. Consider a more wet skim and refreshing activated carbon.
    6. Consider using gloves when putting my hands in the tank to limit potential bacterial infection from rock/coral abrasions on my skin.
    Any other takeaways I could be missing?

    — Stay Salty

  • @mescobar
    SCRM😎 Cool Kids🌸Polyp WhispererOP
    Joined Aug 202629 posts155 pts★5.0(1)
    🔧 Build Contributor
    Oct 3#4
    Overall, it's nice to know that my reef tank is relatively similar to many of those in the data set. It’s also nice to get the stamp of approval that my <3 yr old tank has a mature biome. Even though it’s evidenced by my ability to grow acropora. Part of me is curious though, had I not seen these results and maintained my existing habits, what would be the trajectory of my tank. Old tank syndrome? BJD? Random bleaching events? Unexplained fish deaths? I think the uncomfortable takeaway that maybe most of us won’t agree with is; we need to do more water changes. I know, I too am upset. I wish I didn’t have to pay for a biome test to come to that conclusion, but at least now you won’t have to (and won’t be able to). For those curious, since the time of sample collection my last water change was ~30%, 3 months earlier. Did anyone else happen to do a biome test before they closed shop? It would be cool to compare results with others.

    — Stay Salty

  • @Ndrwater
    SCRM😎 Cool Kids⚡SPS Slinger
    Joined Aug 202687 posts395 pts
    Oct 4#5
    This is really interesting... I can tell you from a layman's perspective and having successful SPS tanks with over a decade of continuous "running" I have always believed in a water change and gravel vac.. Not saying massive (like i had to do recently because if my own laziness), but i have ALWAYS seen a positive reaction in the corals with color and polyp extension.. I also know there are a ton of reefers out there that would say the exact opposite . I think its a good opportunity to have a discussion with the pros and cons of each method of reef keeping. I also think there is something to be said, both pro and con, about bare bottom. I have a feeling that many of the perceived issues you have a direct cause and effect to a sandbed. Really interesting stuff.. Thanks for posting this. Gives me ideas about future speakers for SCRM...

    — Yup....

  • More in General

    • Valonia zero, pithos one!
      @Drexl · 1 reply · 5h ago
    • Flow Simulator
      @Fog_King_Reefer · 1 reply · 4d ago
    • T. gigas and climate change
      @Drexl · 3 replies · Sep 29
    • confused.... temperature issues
      @kwerber · 0 replies · Sep 17
    • Tridacna love
      @Drexl · 7 replies · Sep 15